Where to locate Mandarin localizers?
汉语里的方位成分应该放在什么位置?
Chao Li 李朝

Abstract 摘要
The paper shows that neither monosyllabic localizers nor disyllabic localizers in Mandarin are postpositions. More importantly, it argues that, contra pre-vious uniform treatments of monosyllabic localizers as postpositions, clitics, or deviates of nouns, monosyllabic localizers in Mandarin in fact serve dif-ferent functions in different contexts or constructions. Specifically, they can be used as a noun in at least a few limited contexts, as a root in a polymor-phemic word, and as a clitic when attached to a full-fledged NP. The paper shows that disyllabic localizers serve similar functions though, unlike mono-syllabic localizers, they can be used as regular nouns. The paper thus demon-strates that localizers, whether monosyllabic or disyllabic, can all be ana-lyzed with crosslinguistic notions like “noun,” “root,” and “clitic.” When monosyllabic and disyllabic localizers are used as nouns, they function as independent words. When they are a component of a polymorphemic word, they serve as a nominal root. When they function as a clitic, they are also nominal in nature.

本文认为,汉语普通话里的单音节及双音节方位成分(汉语语法书里多称为“方位词”)都不是后置词。更重要的是,文章提出如下观点:之前把单音节方位成分仅仅描述或分析为后置词、附着形式或名词的偏离类都是不太合适的,因为它们在不同的语境或结构中表现出不同的功能和用途。具体而言,单音节方位成分在有限的语境中可用作名词,在多语素词中可以作词根,还可以在跟复杂的名词短语连用时作附着形式。文章指出,尽管双音节方位成分可以作为普通名词来用,它们跟单音节方位成分有类似功能。所以,无论是单音节方位成分还是双音节方位成分,它们都可以用像“名词”、“词根”和“附着形式”这样的跨语言概念来描述和分析。它们单独作名词时是独立的词,它们作多语素词的构词成分时是名词性词根,而它们作附着形式时也可以说具有名词性。

Subject Keywords 主题词

Localizer 方位成分 Mandarin Chinese 汉语 Clitic 附着形式 Postposition 后置词 Noun 名词


Journal of Chinese Linguistics vol.47, no.2 (June 2019): 345-370
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Chinese Linguistices. All rights reserved.

Article 文章

<< Back 返回

Readers 读者